Good trade?

Related:
Create New Tag

9/14/2013 5:46 AM
Edited Date/Time: 9/14/2013 5:47 AM

My old stock frame for a pair of perfect 10s? My frame is pretty beat up. I'm about 6' 3ish, and my frame is pretty low. I figure worst comes to worst i could trade the 10s for smaller bars

|

Honestly? Who gives a shit. Its the fucking internet. I hate all of you equally.
-HardBMX_Tim

9/14/2013 7:42 AM

Do it ! Perfect 10's are ..... Perfect

|

9/14/2013 7:43 AM

Yeah id fo for it

|

Murica bike check
REFS four, tomdon, bmx1995, jared42069, obiwan chromoly, hate breeder, nshs2010, asilva23, rascio,
Alfred NYC, Kymike, chuck8273(kind of), tc86, Ugot2dewitt, LLURider, dprc, ecuadevil, scramhype, Mario.villegas90(X2), dirtstars22, Brian_Griffin

9/14/2013 11:20 PM

those bars are gay.

|

9/15/2013 8:01 AM

Scenekid69 wrote:

those bars are gay.

why cuz you dont have em?

|

9/15/2013 8:10 AM

I think its a good trade even for a pair of tards.

|

Check out my youtube channel!! http://www.youtube.com/user/mikel8149

9/15/2013 8:37 AM

If you're 6'3" then ride em!

|




Refs : SnM An1mal, GThompson121, Chuck8273, blizzbikes, bmxsteve99, kevin.brock.338, zinum, Brian_Griffin, billyhandyjunior, riverM, tomdon
Instagram : @timhankinsbmx


9/15/2013 10:48 AM

Scenekid69 wrote:

those bars are gay.

BRANDON_90 wrote:

why cuz you dont have em?

No? because they too big and weigh near two pounds. I have 5 pairs of bars, I'm sure I could've bought p10s if i wanted.

|

9/15/2013 11:10 AM

i would trade. my friend has them and they are pretty nice kinda heavy tho

|

9/15/2013 11:31 AM

Scenekid69 wrote:

those bars are gay.

BRANDON_90 wrote:

why cuz you dont have em?

Scenekid69 wrote:

No? because they too big and weigh near two pounds. I have 5 pairs of bars, I'm sure I could've bought p10s if i wanted.

Fuckin weight weenie. SMH

|

9/15/2013 12:10 PM

BRANDON_90 wrote:

Fuckin weight weenie. SMH

You're right, I should some heavy piece of shit shouldn't I? With bars that weigh half of what my frame weighs. No thanks this is not 2002.

|