fit 2.4 or hawks 2.4??

Related:
Create New Tag

12/30/2013 8:13 PM

help

|

12/30/2013 8:26 PM

Out of those the Fit fafs just because the 2.4 will be coming in the aggressive tread now too

|

Murica bike check
REFS four, tomdon, bmx1995, jared42069, obiwan chromoly, hate breeder, nshs2010, asilva23, rascio,
Alfred NYC, Kymike, chuck8273(kind of), tc86, Ugot2dewitt, LLURider, dprc, ecuadevil, scramhype, Mario.villegas90(X2), dirtstars22, Brian_Griffin

12/30/2013 9:31 PM

handlebar-to-face wrote:

Out of those the Fit fafs just because the 2.4 will be coming in the aggressive tread now too

Cool, where did you hear that?

|

Chris

www.bmxtransition.com
Canadian BMX Mailorder
Instagram: @transitionbmx

12/31/2013 2:09 PM

I heard that the Fit FAF's in 2.4 have no significant size increase compared to the 2.25 FAF's. In other words , if you want them for the size , apparently they're smaller then Fit says. If you want fat tires , get the Hawks.

Personally I'd get the Hawks because they look really good , high pressure tires , and the slick design is good for everything. Plus they do get pretty big !

|

Instagram : braydenbuckingham
My Cult 2 Short

1/1/2014 3:39 AM

Brayden_Buckingham wrote:

I heard that the Fit FAF's in 2.4 have no significant size increase compared to the 2.25 FAF's. In other words , if you want them for the size , apparently they're smaller then Fit says. If you want fat tires , get the Hawks.

Personally I'd get the Hawks because they look really good , high pressure tires , and the slick design is good for everything. Plus they do get pretty big !

Both the 2.25 FAFs and the 2.4 Hawks inflate to 2.36", while the 2.4 FAFs inflate to 2.44".

|